|


Methods of Chemical Treatment of Waste MRF
There are three basic methods:
Chemical splitting with polyvalent metastable salts
|
Chemical de-emulsification with polymers
|
Various combinations of #1 and #2 above
|
Treatment by polyvalent metastable salts
The typical metastable salts are:
Compound |
Type |
| Sodium Chloride |
monovalent cation |
| Calcium Chloride |
divalent cation |
| Magnesium Chloride |
divalent cation |
| Magnesium Sulfate |
divalent cation |
| Ferrous Sulfate |
divalent cation |
| Ferric Chloride |
trivalent cation |
| Aluminum Sulfate |
trivalent cation |
The most common methods are:
- Acid alum caustic split
- Acid calcium chloride caustic split
| Both of these methods use a salt, either alum (aluminum sulfate) or
calcium chloride, to provide the necessary positive charges (aluminum with three positive
charges per ion, as Al+++, or calcium with two positive charges per ion, as Ca++).
|
|
|
| The concurrent addition of acid to a pH of 2.5 to 3.0 and one of the above
salts helps to destabilize the emulsion. The most common and least expensive acid (per
pound) to lower the pH to this level is sulfuric acid. This is due to the fact that most
surfactant chemistry works best in the alkaline pH ranges of 8.0 to 13.0. The net amount of aluminum or calcium varies between 300 mg/L to 3,000 mg/L depending on
the emulsion stability of the solution being treated. |
|
|
| After about 15 minutes of contact time with the acid and aluminum or
calcium, the pH is raised (typically with sodium or calcium hydroxide) to somewhere
between 5.5 and 8.5 depending on the surfactant chemistry present. If there is a
sufficient amount of oil present, the resulting destabilized oil phase will gradually
float, and a water-like phase will separate to the bottom. |
|
MRF Effluent Characteristics After Sulfuric Acid, Aluminum Sulfate, Sodium Hydroxide
Chemical Method
|
BOD5 |
COD |
O&G |
pH |
Fluid A |
500 |
850 |
80 |
5.0 |
| Fluid B |
1,100 |
2,500 |
200 |
.5.2 |
| Fluid C |
2,000 |
6,500 |
500 |
5.5 |
| Fluid D |
1,200 |
20,000 |
250 |
5.0 |
| Fluid E |
1,500 |
22,000 |
240 |
5.3 |
| Fluid F |
120 |
28,000 |
110 |
6.0 |
All readings are in mg/L except pH, which is
in standard units.
Treatment by Polymers
| Polymers can contain metastable salts and/or complex proprietary organic chemistries
that have a unique affinity for oil. The polymers draw the oil phases into their organic
molecular structure, thus causing a separation. Careful polymer selection can result in
very good oil separation, with very high oil/water density ratios. These oil water
concentrations after polymer treatment can be as high as 80% (volume/volume). |
|
|
| With very stable emulsions, the addition of an acid, metastable salt, positively
charged (cationic) polymer, sodium hydroxide, and a negatively charged polymer (anionic)
in a series reaction may be required to produce any effective separation. |
|
|
| Some solutions with strong amounts of chelating compounds, such as sodium EDTA can be
virtually impossible to treat by any chemical method. |
|
|
| Overall, these treatment methods can be done in a batch process or in a series
reaction with cascading tanks, with each treatment stage in separate tanks. Separation can
be enhanced with the use of fine micro-bubble air injected near the bottom of the final
process tank. Dissolved air flotation is one common method to provide enhanced
micro-bubble separation. |
|
|
| The chemical cost to treat by this method varies by the concentration of oil in the
spent metal removal solution and / or the strength of the emulsifiers that are present.
The chemical costs, for a 5% volume/volume spent metalworking solution can be between 0.6
and 1.2 cents per gallon. These costs can further vary by the type and amount of chelating
chemistries present since they interfere with the precipitation and flocculation process. |
|
back to top

|